The final section should be an appraisal of your system and whether, in particular, it has met the objectives set out in the Analysis phase. Reflect critically on what you have done and assess how well you have met your aims. Include the real user's comments, if possible, preferably in such a way that they are clearly genuine (e.g. on headed paper). Include suggestions for amendment or improvement, either from you or your user. Be critical of your own efforts but do not blame other people for any shortcomings, especially not the users! If you were over-ambitious say so.
Expected contents for this section of the report:
Comparison of project performance against objectives;
Possible extensions;
User feedback.
Word process the report and set it it out in sections that correspond to the headings in the mark scheme. Use Headings from the Styles list and include a table of contents. Put name, candidate number and school in the footer with page number in the bottom right corner. Refer to appendices where appropriate. Add an index if you fell it helps.
There are 3 marks for Quality of Written Communication.